Breaking News From Jordans

Frank Joynson devoted 40 years to caring for others. In November 2007 his world came crashing down when he was wrongfully convicted of abusing 5 former residents under his care.

Those who represented Frank never faltered in their belief that he had suffered a serious miscarriage of justice and never had a fair trial.

Despite deplorable press reporting at the time, his case was strenuously advanced.

Yesterday that determination was rewarded when the Court of Appeal recognised that there were serious concerns about the safety of this conviction. That several of the complainants credibility was seriously in question and that the delay in bringing these allegations before a court for 38 years had seriously prejudiced Mr Joynson to the extent that no fair trial was possible.

The court in a Landmark ruling made clear that where documents were missing these could affect both specific and non specific allegations and that when complainants were undermined their lack of credibility must have a knock on effect on other prosecution witnesses.

The Court decided that as a result all of Frank’s convictions were unsafe and the Crown did not seek a re-trial.

Yesterday Mr Joynson was restored to a position of someone with an unblemished career of over 40 years in the care industry. He was restored back to his family.

This case raises serious questions. The decision will affect other former carers and teachers who maintain their innocence and seek to challenge their wrongful convictions.